Singapore / A question worth following /
A grey sky, and a longer question.
A hazy-looking day in Singapore sent me back to a subject I had not thought about for a while: Beijing’s air.
- Singapore · October 2026
- An observation, then a question
- Readings and time scales
Singapore had been looking grey when I brought up the air quality in October. It also made me realise how long it had been since I had stopped to think about Beijing’s history with haze.
I wanted to go beyond remembering the bad years. What changed, how much changed, and how should we judge the result? I asked about the history, the policies, the longer-term figures and how the experience had been discussed elsewhere.
One useful place to start is the measure itself. NEA publishes one-hour PM₂.₅ concentrations alongside the 24-hour PSI. One is a concentration, the other an index; a single hour and an annual average answer different questions.
The Beijing figures below give that longer view a concrete starting point: 89.5 micrograms per cubic metre in 2013 and 30.5 in 2024, a reduction of 65.9%. That is a substantial change in the annual mean. It is also a reason to keep the year, the unit and the original source attached to the number.
There is another distinction I want to keep visible as this site grows: a model forecast and a monitoring-station observation are different kinds of evidence. A model can help compare the same hour across cities, but its grid covers an area. It cannot tell me exactly what a particular street looked or felt like.
That is the starting point for the city observatory linked below. I can put Singapore beside Beijing, or look at cities connected to my studies and work, and move through a shared timeline. The source, retrieval time and local time stay beside the chart. The historical annual figures remain here, answering their own longer-term question.
I also wanted to understand how Beijing’s experience had been discussed elsewhere. A percentage change can start that conversation, but the policies, the period covered and the local context still deserve a closer look. The next useful question is often about how the result was reached.
This is one of the things I enjoy about following a question: an ordinary observation can turn into a much bigger piece of learning. The grey sky was the beginning of the conversation. Understanding what the numbers mean is where the investigation starts to become useful.
READ THE MEASURE / THEN THE NUMBER
Read the measure first.
Short-term variation
A concentration in micrograms per cubic metre. NEA reports five regions: north, south, east, west and central. It shows changes within the day.
| Year | PM₂.₅ / µg/m³ |
|---|---|
| 2013 | 89.5 |
| 2024 | 30.5 |
65.9%Reduction from 2013 to 2024
Two published annual observations. Source: Beijing Municipal Ecology and Environment Bureau’s press briefing on 2024 air quality.
AFTER READING / THE CONVERSATION
What would you add?
Add an experience, ask a question or point out a correction. Both language editions share this article’s discussion.
Public comments are not open yet. Keep a draft on this device, or send your thoughts through the contact page.
Write a local draft
Only “Save on this device” stores the draft. Clear it on shared devices; it is not published automatically.
0 / 1600